Overview HAZÜ
Ukraine ratified the Convention in August 2022. As a result of this ratification and the previous accession of the European Union, the required number of member states was reached and the convention was able to enter into force one year later.
In the EU area (with the exception of Denmark), the Hague Convention will in future supplement the EU Brussels I Regulation, the Lugano Convention and the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements.
In addition to the EU and Ukraine, five other countries (Costa Rica, Israel, Russia, the USA and Uruguay) have signed the Hague Convention but have not yet ratified it. Its practical significance is therefore still limited to the relationship with Ukraine, as the EU GDPR in particular has priority among the EU member states.
The Hague Convention provides that judgments of a contracting state that are valid and enforceable there are to be recognized and enforced in the other contracting states. The prerequisite is that the foreign court bases its international jurisdiction on a ground specified in Art. 5 Hague Convention.
Art. 7 para. 1 Hague Convention defines six situations in which recognition and enforcement can be refused. These are the following cases, which are also included in the EU GDPR:
- Poor delivery
- Fraudulently obtaining the judgment title
- Violation of the odre public
- Breach of jurisdiction agreement
- Conflicting judgment in the requested State
- Conflicting earlier decision
Conclusion on the HAZÜ
For the time being, the Hague Convention has no significance within Europe due to the primacy of the EU GDPR. Beyond the borders of the EU, the RAPTA is primarily aimed at the USA, which is an extremely important economic partner but has not yet ratified the RAPTA. Accordingly, the Hague Convention is of very limited significance for the time being. Please also read my detailed article on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Germany.
