LEGAL+ NEWS
Or: When are submissions in the appeal instance “new”?
In its decision of 27.2.2018, case no. VIII ZR 90/17, the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) specified – very importantly for practice – how comprehensively the so-called pleading discount pursuant to Section 283 ZPO is to be understood (see also the blog post: Appeal courts often wrongly reject late submissions at first instance).
The court of first instance must grant the party surprised by the late submission of the opposing party the right to be heard – without adjourning or reopening the oral hearing – by giving this party the opportunity to comment on this submission within a certain period of time at its request.
With regard to the scope of the opportunity to comment in the sense described above, the courts of lower instances – as the BGH has now once again pointed out – tend to have too narrow an understanding, which tends to limit admissible submissions solely to comments on the correctness or incorrectness of the submission in question.
The BGH has made it clear that the right to comment goes much further:
Entirely new submissions are also to be admitted if and insofar as they are made “in response to the belated submissions of the opposing party”.
The BGH has stated (see decision of 27.2.2018, para. 24):
“Section 283 ZPO is intended to enable a party who is no longer able to respond to an opponent’s submission in good time to make a statement on this within a certain period of time, i.e. to dispute or concede it – if necessary also by means of substantiated counterclaims – or finally to counter it by means of an independent means of attack or defense, possibly based on new factual assertions.
This means:
Even completely (!) new allegations may be admissible if they are to be considered as a “reaction” to the late submission of the opponent.
If the court of first instance fails to recognize this and disregards the allegations in question in its judgment with reference to Section 296a ZPO, this is not a “new” submission in the appeal instance, which must be assessed by the court of appeal without further ado.
The lesson to be learned from this ruling is that even higher courts repeatedly misapply procedural rules. So: watch out!
LATEST ARTICLES
Guide to GmbH law: The duties and liability risks of the managing director of a GmbH
In the external relationship, only the GmbH is liable, which can indemnify its managing directors. However, this does not mean that external liability of the managing directors is excluded.
In addition to personal liability in the area of tax and social security law, the managing director may also be liable on the basis of his own contractual obligations, on the basis of an induced legal appearance, on the basis of (personal) culpability when concluding the contract and in tort.
For the aforementioned reasons, every managing director of a GmbH is urgently recommended to be familiar with the requirements for proper managing director activities.
Estimation of fictitious defect rectification costs
For some time now, a landmark decision by the Federal Court of Justice has clarified that the contractual claim for damages in lieu of performance pursuant to Sections 437 No. 3, 280, 281 BGB can be assessed on the basis of the “fictitious” defect rectification costs that are likely to be necessary but have not yet been incurred, see BGH ruling of 12.03.2021, Ref. V ZR 33/19. In practice, it is of particular relevance how the court called upon to decide in an individual case is to determine the amount of such fictitious damage costs.
EUGH ruling “LKW Walter”
The possibility of being able to enforce one’s own rights as easily and quickly as possible in cross-border EU business transactions, which is very welcome in principle, has some pitfalls. The author’s experience shows that traders are often overwhelmed when they receive legally relevant mail from abroad. This is not least due to the fact that court documents received from abroad often do not meet the requirements of European law.
CONTACT
+49 (40) 57199 74 80
+49 (170) 1203 74 0
Neuer Wall 61 D-20354 Hamburg
kontakt@legal-plus.eu
Benefit from my active network!
I look forward to our networking.
This post is also available in: DE
