Practical Insights
Practical insights for the moments when contracts meet reality.
Contracts often reveal their true character only when a conflict arises. What may look balanced on paper can shift significantly under pressure, often to the disadvantage of the party that overlooked or misjudged a legal or commercial risk.
The articles on this page are based on my daily work in contract design and litigation. A particular focus is on mechanical and plant engineering. In this sector, legal risks often become especially visible: in complex project chains, cross-border contractual relationships and disputes with substantial economic consequences.
The articles address questions that arise again and again in practice: Where are the legal breaking points of a contract? When do they become dangerous in the course of a project? And what can be done before commercial tension turns into litigation?
Each article combines legal substance with the perspective of a lawyer who does not only draft and review contracts, but also conducts the disputes that arise from them.
These articles cannot replace individual legal advice. They do, however, show what matters in practice and where contracts, projects and conflicts should be examined more closely.
LATEST ARTICLES

The obligation of private health insurance (PKV) to pay benefits – when and for what does PKV have to pay?
LEGAL+ NEWS The obligation of private health insurance (PKV) to

Tax advisor liability – statute of limitations in the case of basic rulings
If tax advisors make mistakes and clients suffer losses as a result, the question of whether and to what extent a limitation period has already expired is not easy to answer in legal terms.

Every company claiming credit should check claims for repayment! – On the inadmissibility of so-called processing fees in loan agreements with companies.
According to recent rulings by the Federal Court of Justice (judgments of 4 July 2017, case no. XI ZR 562/15 and case no. XI ZR 233/16), processing fees that have been customary for a long time are also inadmissible for loans to companies and thus corresponding agreements in loan agreements – even in the case of overdraft facilities – are invalid.
BGH NEWS
Find out about the latest case law of the Federal Court of Justice here
[cetsEmbedRSS id=”http://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/rechtsprechung/bgh/feed.xml” itemcount=”3″ itemauthor=”1″ itemcontent=”1″]
CONTACT
+49 (40) 57199 74 80
+49 (170) 1203 74 0
Bleichenbrücke 11 D-20354 Hamburg
kontakt@legal-plus.eu
Benefit from my active network!
I look forward to our networking.
This post is also available in: DE