LEGAL+ NEWS
Legal+ is now relying on legal tech in contract law and the intelligent, artificial intelligence-based digital contract management solution ContrAxs:
ContrAxs maps the entire life cycle of legal documents. Documents can be innovatively created, quickly and innovatively negotiated, digitally signed, automatically analyzed and finally managed through smart visualization.
For Legal+’s clients, this means greater security and efficiency when drawing up, negotiating, signing and managing contracts. By using the software, Legal+ expects faster processes, more efficient workflows and simplified processing of contract documents with clients.
We are convinced that the use of software from the field of artificial intelligence will further improve our advisory services for our clients. We are convinced that our clients will be able to enjoy a completely new way of working together in contract management.
About BlockAxs GmbH:
BlockAxs GmbH(https://blockaxs.com), based in Berlin, is a German legal tech start-up.
The company focuses on the development of a contract management system for the creation, negotiation and effective digital signature of contracts. BlockAxs combines legal know-how with disruptive technology. The team behind BlockAxs consists mainly of lawyers and computer scientists. Working closely together, they create high-tech modules that speed up and, above all, improve the quality of the day-to-day work of lawyers.
LATEST ARTICLES
On the bias of judges in civil proceedings: If judges do not read a party’s pleadings, this can justify a motion for recusal!
Following on from my overview article on the application for recusal pursuant to Section 42 ZPO, I would like to report on an interesting ruling by the Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe. According to this ruling, a judge’s failure to read the pleadings submitted by a party can give rise to concerns of bias. In the case in question, a judge had overlooked an application for recusal directed against him, as he had forwarded the pleading containing it unread to the opposing party for comment. This violates the so-called duty to wait pursuant to Section 47 (1) ZPO, according to which only “official acts that cannot be postponed” are permitted from the filing of an application for recusal until it has been dealt with.
BGH on the legal consequences of thwarting evidence
In legal disputes, it often happens that one party makes it difficult for the opposing party to provide evidence. In these cases, the question then arises as to whether and, if so, with what legal consequences it can be assumed that evidence has been obstructed.
Guide to procedural law: Easier way to claim damages for exhaust gas manipulation – On the BGH ruling of June 26, 2023 (Ref. Via ZR 335/21)
This article attempts to classify and evaluate the current ruling of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) of June 26, 2023 (Ref. Via ZR 335/21) on the subject of compensation for damages due to emissions manipulation by car manufacturers.
CONTACT
+49 (40) 57199 74 80
+49 (170) 1203 74 0
Neuer Wall 61 D-20354 Hamburg
kontakt@legal-plus.eu
Benefit from my active network!
I look forward to our networking.
This post is also available in: DE
