BGH ruling “Influencer II”

LEGAL+ NEWS

BGH ruling "Influencer II"

In its “Influencer II” ruling, the Federal Court of Justice clarified in response to rejected claims by the VSW (“Association of Social Competition”) that the influencer only has to provide an advertising label for their post if they receive a consideration from the company in question. The press release states:

Social media influencer

In the press release states:

“(…) With regard to commercial acts in favor of third-party companies, the assumption of a violation of Section 5a para. 6 UWG is ruled out because the defendant did not receive any consideration for the contested contributions and these contributions therefore satisfy the overriding special provisions of Section 6 para. 1 no. 1 TMG, Section 58 para. 1 sentence 1 RStV and Section 22 para. 1 sentence 1 MStV (see the above comments on proceedings I ZR 125/20). Accordingly, there is also no violation of No. 11 of the Annex to Section 3 (3) UWG. “

Do you have any questions?

LATEST ARTICLES

globe ball on table with laptop and notebook,travel concept.
Commercial law

The action for a negative declaratory judgment to prevent a foreign action

If a dispute arises with a foreign business partner, e.g. regarding alleged claims arising from a contract, it is advisable from the point of view of the German contracting party to think about possible procedural scenarios at an early stage in case an agreement fails. If, contrary to the agreements made, it is to be expected that the foreign partner intends to file a lawsuit in the home country, you should immediately consider filing a preventive so-called negative declaratory action at the agreed German place of jurisdiction.

Read more "

CONTACT

LEGAL+

+49 (40) 57199 74 80

+49 (170) 1203 74 0

Neuer Wall 61 D-20354 Hamburg

kontakt@legal-plus.eu

Benefit from my active network!

I look forward to our networking.

Copyright 2025 © All rights reserved.

This post is also available in: DE