LEGAL+ NEWS
Appeal law: When is a submission late in the appeal proceedings?
The correct decision on late submissions in appeal proceedings is of great practical importance, as late submissions are generally not to be considered by the court of appeal.
In a significant decision, the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has reminded us that in many cases, the court of appeal must nevertheless take into account means of attack and defense that have already been disregarded by the court of first instance (BGH, decision of 27.2.2018 – Ref. VIII ZR 90/17).
The BGH decision on late submissions (case no. VIII ZR 90/17)
- A frequently misinterpreted paragraph is Section 531 (1) ZPO:
“Defense and attacking arguments that were rightly rejected at first instance remain excluded.”
This provision is often interpreted too broadly by appeal courts, particularly in light of Section 296a sentence 1 ZPO:
“After the conclusion of the oral hearing on which the judgment is rendered, no further means of attack or defense may be presented.”
- Many courts of appeal wrongly assume that submissions that were rejected in the first instance pursuant to Section 296a ZPO are also excluded from the appeal proceedings pursuant to Section 531 (1) ZPO.
- As the BGH has stated, this does not correspond to the legal situation under the ZPO. § Section 531 (1) ZPO only applies if the submission was rejected in the first instance on the basis of Section 296 (1) to (3) ZPO. However, if it is based on Section 296a ZPO, Section 531 (1) ZPO does not apply – regardless of whether the decision was correct or incorrect.
Questions about the appeal procedure and late submissions?
Contact me in confidence for professional advice.
On the question of when submissions in the appellate instance are “new”, please also read my article on the scope of a so-called pleading indulgence!
LATEST ARTICLES

Procedural law: The inactive expert witness
The inactive expert witness is a major dilemma for those affected. The legislator has certainly recognized this and, with a reform of the law on expert witnesses with effect from 15.10.2016, has anchored quite relevant tightening in civil procedure law.

Evidential value of private expert opinions
The evidentiary value of private expert opinions is very close to that of court expert opinions. In practice, this is often not the case: many courts tend to regard private expert opinions, i.e. expert opinions commissioned outside the proceedings, as a nuisance. These expert opinions, which are usually “labeled” as biased, are therefore in most cases considered to be of lesser value than court-commissioned expert opinions and are downgraded in the judgment with clichéd justifications. However, this approach, which is widespread in practice, is not covered by supreme court case law! In fact, expert opinions provided by the parties are important for the constitutionally guaranteed legal protection of the parties. This is the only way to fully uncover – not infrequent – errors in court reports.

BGH ruling “Influencer II”
LEGAL+ NEWS BGH ruling “Influencer II” In its “Influencer II”
CONTACT
+49 (40) 57199 74 80
+49 (170) 1203 74 0
Neuer Wall 61 D-20354 Hamburg
kontakt@legal-plus.eu
Benefit from my active network!
I look forward to our networking.
This post is also available in: DE
