DISPUTE PREVENTION
LITIGATION
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT COUNSEL
Clarity and strategy - in contract drafting and in court.
LEGAL+ is your boutique law firm for commercial and civil law advice – with clarity and strategy – independent, focused, personal.
Whether forward-looking contract drafting or consistent litigation: I advise my clients in demanding commercial and civil law matters – focusing on the avoidance and resolution of conflicts.
Clarity and strategy – these are not just buzzwords, but guiding principles of my work:
For you, clarity means: understandable, precise and comprehensible solutions – whether in the contract text or in procedural communication. I tell you openly what works – and what doesn’t.
Strategy means: I don’t work reactively, but with a plan. I think several steps ahead, assess risks honestly and act tactically – so that your goals are achieved efficiently.
LEGAL+ | SPECIALIZATION
1.) Dispute prevention
“The pen is mightier than the sword”
Many lawsuits can be avoided with the right contract design or strategic conflict management.
Read here how I can support you with dispute prevention:
2) Litigation
“If you don’t fight, you’ve already lost”
Resolving conflicts – in court, with strategy, clarity and personal commitment. I represent you in commercial and civil law disputes – nationwide and across borders. From interim legal protection to appeals – and, if necessary, all the way to the Federal Court of Justice.
Read here what I can do for you as a litigation lawyer:
LEGAL+ | LAW FIRM
Why LEGAL+?
LEGAL+ stands for a plus in specialization, a plus in personal support – and a plus in strategic clarity.
You talk to me – not to a changing structure. I work quickly, clearly structured and solution-oriented – for entrepreneurs as well as for private individuals with special concerns.
Boutique instead of large law firm – why many clients deliberately choose differently
In the international economy, many companies reflexively rely on large law firms. Anyone who is a client there is familiar with the principle: files run through several departments, changing contact persons, a high level of frequency – and often little tangible strategy.
I work differently.
As a specialized litigator, I provide focused, personal counsel — grounded in business logic and driven by pragmatic solutions.
Sounds like what you’re looking for? Then let us talk .
REFERENCES
CLIENT TESTIMONIALS
We first met Attorney Daniel Meier-Greve in 2014 and can state that we found a highly competent expert in the field of business law. It is rare nowadays to encounter such a dedicated lawyer—one who not only listens to a company’s concerns but also shows remarkable initiative in familiarizing himself with and thinking along the lines of the company’s philosophy.
On the basis of a recommendation, we retained Attorney Meier-Greve in a highly complex litigation matter. He familiarized himself with the case in an impressively short time. He identified litigation risks without glossing over them and then developed and successfully implemented a targeted strategy together with us. Particularly noteworthy is his consistently transparent approach and his dedication. He truly takes every case personally and is available to his clients around the clock!
Many thanks for your long-standing, dedicated support, which ultimately led to a very successful outcome.
It was a real uphill battle.
In search of a litigation lawyer, we were introduced to Attorney Daniel Meier-Greve through a recommendation and entrusted him with a complex dispute. From the very first contact, Mr. Meier-Greve gave us the reassuring sense that we were in good hands. After the initial alignment, I was able to fully refocus on my daily business while Mr. Meier-Greve took care of everything else and kept me transparently informed. I particularly value his pragmatic approach and his strength as a skilled negotiator. Today I can look back on a successfully resolved matter and know without hesitation whom I will entrust again with JPL’s legal affairs when needed.
"Dear Mr. Meier-Greve,
I relied on my gut instinct after our initial meeting when awarding the mandate and, as I now know, I was absolutely right.
I would now like to thank you.
First of all, thank you for your patience and openness in responding to my questions and objections, and also for your constant dedication to presenting the best possible outcome in court.
With your professional expertise, you explained all the legal issues and procedures to me in a clear and understandable way, which gave me a great sense of confidence.
I always had the feeling that you took your mandate very seriously and were fully committed to the case.
My impression was that you were always attentive to my needs and that you consistently went above and beyond throughout the entire process.
I would also like to add another word of praise: at all times I felt that you genuinely cared about me as a client and that you were truly pleased to be able to help me and win the case for me.
You didn’t ‘just do your job’ — it was evident that you had the motivation to do everything possible to support me as your client. I found this especially positive and consider it exceptional.
I was very pleased to handle this case together with you. Looking ahead, I hope I will not need your services in another civil lawsuit. But I am very glad to have met you as a remarkable person.
Best regards to Hamburg
LATEST ARTICLES

Up to €10,000 before the local court: why it goes wrong
Up to €10,000 in the local court – a mistake with an announcement. The planned reform of the amount in dispute will shift masses of proceedings from the regional courts to the local courts. Sounds like a relief – but will have the opposite effect.

Contract law: Stuttgart 21 and the speech clause – a lesson in clear contract drafting
Sometimes a single sentence decides billions. This is exactly what happened with the Stuttgart 21 project. At the center of the legal dispute was a short contractual provision – the so-called “speech clause”.

Breach of an international jurisdiction agreement can result in liability for damages! – On the ruling of the BGH from 17.10.2019 (Ref. III ZR 42/19)
International agreements on jurisdiction, especially if they are to have exclusive validity, generally have the purpose of protecting the party benefiting from the agreement from the often very considerable costs of a legal dispute in a foreign country.
Unfortunately, however, it is not uncommon for the other contracting party to suddenly no longer want to know about the jurisdiction agreement in the event of a dispute. The background to such a dishonest approach is – obviously – not least the potential for blackmail associated with such an approach. This is because the party that finds itself – in breach of the jurisdiction agreement – exposed to a foreign lawsuit is regularly forced to take action abroad through lawyers in order to avoid legal disadvantages. This in turn is often very expensive, with the USA being the most prominent example.
CONTACT
+49 (40) 57199 74 80
+49 (170) 1203 74 0
Bleichenbrücke 11 D-20354 Hamburg
kontakt@legal-plus.eu
Benefit from my active network!
I look forward to our networking.
This post is also available in: DE



