LITIGATION LAW FIRM FOCUSED ON
MACHINE AND PLANT ENGINEERING
LITIGATION AND CONTRACT DESIGN.
INTERNATIONAL
Trial lawyer Daniel Meier-Greve

CONTRACTS FOR WORK

DISTRIBUTION LAW

TRANSPORT LAW

INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW

Others advise – LEGAL+ takes over.

Litigation requires taking responsibility.

Anyone who stands before a court cannot advise from the sidelines. LEGAL+ takes over – responsibility, leadership, decision-making. Every case is handled as a case of its own, with the same care with which one would defend one’s own interests. Taking over means not shifting risk back to the client but carrying it: with a clear position, thorough preparation and the willingness to assume responsibility in conflict – until judgment or until a solution that endures.

Where LEGAL+ takes over

LEGAL+ operates where commercial relationships need to be structured, enforced or defended — with a particular focus on two areas:

Mechanical and plant engineering.
Manufacturers, suppliers and subcontractors in the mechanical and plant engineering sector regularly face a particular risk position: they perform in advance, they carry the financing burden, and if a project derails, the pressure usually turns against them. LEGAL+ acts exclusively for the supply side — with contracts that hold up in the project and with enforcement when the conflict escalates.

Read here what I can do for you in mechanical and plant engineering:

International disputes.
When a foreign business partner fails to pay, a claim is filed from abroad, or a German judgment must be enforced across borders, more is required than general contract law. LEGAL+ combines litigation experience with international procedural law — from jurisdiction and service to cross-border enforcement. In mechanical and plant engineering in particular, one of Germany’s strongest export sectors, cross-border disputes are part of day-to-day business. This is precisely why the two focus areas of LEGAL+ come together here so naturally.

Read here how LEGAL+ can support you in international disputes:

Process prevention

Rechtsanwalt Daniel J. Meier-Greve | BEYOND ADVICE

Why LEGAL+

Because LEGAL+ takes over.

LEGAL+ stands for more legal responsibility, personal involvement and efficiency. Your mandate is handled by an experienced litigator who personally conducts the case and thinks litigation and the underlying contracts together. This means for you in practical terms:
• fewer opinions
• more decisions
• more and faster results
LEGAL+ takes control of your case while you can concentrate on your business. This type of assumption of responsibility is what “Beyond Advice” stands for.

  • fewer opinions
  • more decisions
  • more and faster results


LEGAL+ takes control of your case while you can concentrate on your business. This type of assumption of responsibility is what “Beyond Advice” stands for.

REFERENCES

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

LATEST ARTICLES

Present your case...Serious young judge sitting in the courtroom with a stern facial expression.
Nicht kategorisiert

The court’s duty to provide information in civil proceedings

It is not uncommon for courts to simply remain silent until the first hearing date – in the worst case, years can pass until then. As a result, the parties do not know where they stand for a long time and eagerly await the hearing date, from which they hope to finally learn the court’s point of view. It is often only during the court hearing that judges then issue so-called judicial instructions in accordance with Section 139 (2) and (3) ZPO. This procedure is unlawful!

Read more "
Plenty of space on this one. An african-american woman showing you a USB stick.
Nicht kategorisiert

Reference to USB stick in the application

Our latest article analyzes the BGH ruling of 14.07.2022, which for the first time allows reference to a USB stick in the claim. Find out how this ruling expands the scope of digitalization in civil proceedings and what consequences it has for practice.

Read more "
Gavel, scales of justice and law books
Nicht kategorisiert

Action dismissed as “currently unfounded”

Disputes under construction law in particular often concern the due date of remuneration claims, e.g. because acceptance as a prerequisite for payment is questionable. In these cases, it is not uncommon for judgments to be handed down in which a claim is dismissed “as currently unfounded”.

The BGH recently stated in detail that in such cases the res judicata effect of the dismissing judgment also includes the grounds for the judgment, insofar as the other – i.e. the currently not missing – claim requirements have been positively established or affirmed.

Read more "

CONTACT

LEGAL+

kontakt@legal-plus.eu

+49 (40) 57199 74 80

+49 (170) 1203 74 0

Bleichenbrücke 11 D-20354 Hamburg

Benefit from my active network!

I look forward to our networking.

Copyright 2026 © All rights reserved.

This post is also available in: DE