Legal litigation law firm
Trial lawyer Daniel Meier-Greve

DISPUTE PREVENTION

LITIGATION

DISPUTE RESOLUTION

INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT COUNSEL

Clarity and strategy - in contract drafting and in court.

LEGAL+ is your boutique law firm for commercial and civil law advice – with clarity and strategy – independent, focused, personal.

Whether forward-looking contract drafting or consistent litigation: I advise my clients in demanding commercial and civil law matters – focusing on the avoidance and resolution of conflicts.

Clarity and strategy – these are not just buzzwords, but guiding principles of my work:

For you, clarity means: understandable, precise and comprehensible solutions – whether in the contract text or in procedural communication. I tell you openly what works – and what doesn’t.
Strategy means: I don’t work reactively, but with a plan. I think several steps ahead, assess risks honestly and act tactically – so that your goals are achieved efficiently.

LEGAL+ | SPECIALIZATION

1.) Dispute prevention

“The pen is mightier than the sword”

Many lawsuits can be avoided with the right contract design or strategic conflict management.

Read here how I can support you with dispute prevention:

Process prevention

2) Litigation

“If you don’t fight, you’ve already lost”

Resolving conflicts – in court, with strategy, clarity and personal commitment. I represent you in commercial and civil law disputes – nationwide and across borders. From interim legal protection to appeals – and, if necessary, all the way to the Federal Court of Justice.

Read here what I can do for you as a litigation lawyer:

Process management

LEGAL+ | LAW FIRM

LEGAL+ | Attorney Daniel J. Meier-Greve

Why LEGAL+?

LEGAL+ stands for a plus in specialization, a plus in personal support – and a plus in strategic clarity.

You talk to me – not to a changing structure. I work quickly, clearly structured and solution-oriented – for entrepreneurs as well as for private individuals with special concerns.

Boutique instead of large law firm – why many clients deliberately choose differently

In the international economy, many companies reflexively rely on large law firms. Anyone who is a client there is familiar with the principle: files run through several departments, changing contact persons, a high level of frequency – and often little tangible strategy.

I work differently.

As a specialized litigator, I provide focused, personal counsel — grounded in business logic and driven by pragmatic solutions.

Sounds like what you’re looking for? Then let us talk .

REFERENCES

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

LATEST ARTICLES

Present your case...Serious young judge sitting in the courtroom with a stern facial expression.
Nicht kategorisiert

The court’s duty to provide information in civil proceedings

It is not uncommon for courts to simply remain silent until the first hearing date – in the worst case, years can pass until then. As a result, the parties do not know where they stand for a long time and eagerly await the hearing date, from which they hope to finally learn the court’s point of view. It is often only during the court hearing that judges then issue so-called judicial instructions in accordance with Section 139 (2) and (3) ZPO. This procedure is unlawful!

Read more "
Plenty of space on this one. An african-american woman showing you a USB stick.
Nicht kategorisiert

Reference to USB stick in the application

Our latest article analyzes the BGH ruling of 14.07.2022, which for the first time allows reference to a USB stick in the claim. Find out how this ruling expands the scope of digitalization in civil proceedings and what consequences it has for practice.

Read more "
Gavel, scales of justice and law books
Nicht kategorisiert

Action dismissed as “currently unfounded”

Disputes under construction law in particular often concern the due date of remuneration claims, e.g. because acceptance as a prerequisite for payment is questionable. In these cases, it is not uncommon for judgments to be handed down in which a claim is dismissed “as currently unfounded”.

The BGH recently stated in detail that in such cases the res judicata effect of the dismissing judgment also includes the grounds for the judgment, insofar as the other – i.e. the currently not missing – claim requirements have been positively established or affirmed.

Read more "
Order the PRINT brochure WITH PRACTICAL CONTRACTING TIPS free of charge
Order the PRINT brochure WITH PRACTICAL CONTRACTING TIPS free of charge

CONTACT

LEGAL+

+49 (40) 57199 74 80

+49 (170) 1203 74 0

Bleichenbrücke 11 D-20354 Hamburg

kontakt@legal-plus.eu

Benefit from my active network!

I look forward to our networking.

Copyright 2025 © All rights reserved.

This post is also available in: DE