BEYOND ADVICE

Trial lawyer Daniel Meier-Greve

LITIGATION

CONTRACT DESIGN

DISPUTE RESOLUTION

INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT COUNSEL

Others advise – LEGAL+ takes over.

Litigation requires taking responsibility.

Anyone who stands before a court cannot advise from the sidelines. LEGAL+ takes over – responsibility, leadership, decision-making. Every case is handled as a case of its own, with the same care with which one would defend one’s own interests. Taking over means not shifting risk back to the client but carrying it: with a clear position, thorough preparation and the willingness to assume responsibility in conflict – until judgment or until a solution that endures.

Where LEGAL+ takes over

LEGAL+ takes over where your commercial relationships must also be legally supported, enforced or defended. Typical situations are complex contracts and projects of significant economic relevance, where you do not wish to leave the legal foundations to chance, or where collaboration with a contractual partner begins to destabilise.

The spectrum ranges from contract work in complex or long-term business relationships – such as distribution, supply, project or other commercial framework agreements – to already escalated situations: breaking down supply and project relationships, payment and receivables conflicts with serious financial impact, substantial defect constellations, liability cases or consequential breaches of contract – also in a cross-border context.

LEGAL+ takes over when “letting things run” is no longer a responsible option and the situation requires clear structure, robust assessment and, quite simply, enforcement. Contracts are designed in such a way that they actually withstand dispute. Disputes are conducted with the necessary firmness to assert your interests to the greatest extent possible.

Read here which disputes LEGAL+ takes over.

Read here which contract types LEGAL+ regularly works with.

Process prevention

Rechtsanwalt Daniel J. Meier-Greve | BEYOND ADVICE

Why LEGAL+

Because LEGAL+ takes over.

LEGAL+ stands for more legal responsibility, personal involvement and efficiency. Your mandate is handled by an experienced litigator who personally conducts the case and thinks litigation and the underlying contracts together. This means for you in practical terms:
• fewer opinions
• more decisions
• more and faster results
LEGAL+ takes control of your case while you can concentrate on your business. This type of assumption of responsibility is what “Beyond Advice” stands for.

  • fewer opinions
  • more decisions
  • more and faster results


LEGAL+ takes control of your case while you can concentrate on your business. This type of assumption of responsibility is what “Beyond Advice” stands for.

REFERENCES

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

LATEST ARTICLES

Present your case...Serious young judge sitting in the courtroom with a stern facial expression.
Nicht kategorisiert

The court’s duty to provide information in civil proceedings

It is not uncommon for courts to simply remain silent until the first hearing date – in the worst case, years can pass until then. As a result, the parties do not know where they stand for a long time and eagerly await the hearing date, from which they hope to finally learn the court’s point of view. It is often only during the court hearing that judges then issue so-called judicial instructions in accordance with Section 139 (2) and (3) ZPO. This procedure is unlawful!

Read more "
Plenty of space on this one. An african-american woman showing you a USB stick.
Nicht kategorisiert

Reference to USB stick in the application

Our latest article analyzes the BGH ruling of 14.07.2022, which for the first time allows reference to a USB stick in the claim. Find out how this ruling expands the scope of digitalization in civil proceedings and what consequences it has for practice.

Read more "
Gavel, scales of justice and law books
Nicht kategorisiert

Action dismissed as “currently unfounded”

Disputes under construction law in particular often concern the due date of remuneration claims, e.g. because acceptance as a prerequisite for payment is questionable. In these cases, it is not uncommon for judgments to be handed down in which a claim is dismissed “as currently unfounded”.

The BGH recently stated in detail that in such cases the res judicata effect of the dismissing judgment also includes the grounds for the judgment, insofar as the other – i.e. the currently not missing – claim requirements have been positively established or affirmed.

Read more "
Order the PRINT brochure WITH PRACTICAL CONTRACTING TIPS free of charge
Order the PRINT brochure WITH PRACTICAL CONTRACTING TIPS free of charge

CONTACT

LEGAL+

kontakt@legal-plus.eu

+49 (40) 57199 74 80

+49 (170) 1203 74 0

Bleichenbrücke 11 D-20354 Hamburg

Benefit from my active network!

I look forward to our networking.

Copyright 2025 © All rights reserved.

This post is also available in: DE