Casting doubt on the right of competition associations to file applications!

LEGAL+ NEWS

So-called. warning letters (cf. § 8 Para. 3 No. 2 UWG) are causing the economy a lot of trouble. Smaller companies or start-ups in particular often cannot afford to defend themselves. This overlooks the fact that a warning association is only authorized to pursue alleged infringements of competition law under strict conditions. This follows from Section 8 (3) No. 2 UWG:

“The claims arising from paragraph 1 are due to: (…)
2. associations with legal capacity for the promotion of commercial or independent professional interests, insofar as a significant number of entrepreneurs belong to them who sell goods or services of the same or a related kind on the same market, if they are able, in particular in terms of their personnel, material and financial resources, to actually perform their statutory tasks of pursuing commercial or independent professional interests and insofar as the infringement affects the interests of their members;”

This means:

A warning association may only take action in individual cases if:

it may count among its members a significant number of members who sell
goods or services of the same or a related kind on the same market.

In short: If a warning association wants to take action against an advertising agency, for example, it must generally have a considerable number of advertising agencies (or similar companies) among its members.

Regrettably, case law is quite generous when examining this generally strict requirement. However, this may also be due to the fact that the parties concerned do not question the right of the competition association “attacking” them to file an application or bring an action with the necessary tenacity. From my own experience, I can report on a case in which an internet search regarding alleged members led to astonishing findings:

It turned out that not a single one of the four members of the relevant industry listed could be verified. On the contrary: one of the alleged advertising agencies turned out to be a beauty clinic.

The lesson to be learned from this is that it is always worth questioning the information on the list of members from which every warning association derives its supposed authority to suspect competition law infringements!

Do you have any questions?

LATEST ARTICLES

Commercial law

Procedural law: The inactive expert witness

The inactive expert witness is a major dilemma for those affected. The legislator has certainly recognized this and, with a reform of the law on expert witnesses with effect from 15.10.2016, has anchored quite relevant tightening in civil procedure law.

Evidential value of private expert opinions

The evidentiary value of private expert opinions is very close to that of court expert opinions. In practice, this is often not the case: many courts tend to regard private expert opinions, i.e. expert opinions commissioned outside the proceedings, as a nuisance. These expert opinions, which are usually “labeled” as biased, are therefore in most cases considered to be of lesser value than court-commissioned expert opinions and are downgraded in the judgment with clichéd justifications. However, this approach, which is widespread in practice, is not covered by supreme court case law! In fact, expert opinions provided by the parties are important for the constitutionally guaranteed legal protection of the parties. This is the only way to fully uncover – not infrequent – errors in court reports.